<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for FIX YOUR MIX .com » BLOG</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fixyourmix.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com</link>
	<description>Recording Tips &#124; Production Trends &#124; Songwriting Analysis of Pop, Rap, &#38; Indie Rock.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:59:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Atlas&#8221; by Battles: A Compositional Analysis by Indie Rock Analysis &#124; The Indaba Music Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/atlas-by-battles-a-compositional-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-14002</link>
		<dc:creator>Indie Rock Analysis &#124; The Indaba Music Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=1160#comment-14002</guid>
		<description>[...] Long ago and far away I was a college music major, and to this day I remain an incomparable dork, so I was quite pleased when I stumbled across a post by the online audio production consultants at Fix Your Mix which examined one of my favorite new rock bands through those academia-colored glasses. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Long ago and far away I was a college music major, and to this day I remain an incomparable dork, so I was quite pleased when I stumbled across a post by the online audio production consultants at Fix Your Mix which examined one of my favorite new rock bands through those academia-colored glasses. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Compositional Analysis of &#8220;Kids&#8221; by MGMT by LaneCoutell</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/a-compositional-analysis-of-kids-by-mgmt/comment-page-1/#comment-13596</link>
		<dc:creator>LaneCoutell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=951#comment-13596</guid>
		<description>Well you said that MGMT had &quot;no concept of music theory&quot; and that they play monophonic cause &quot;it could be a product of musicians who don’t have the classical training to handle multiple notes at once&quot; but you have to know that they both studied music in University and they do have musical theory insights but they tend to go against them to create their unique tunes, just listen to the whole Oracular Spectacular record and you&#039;ll hear some of most original material writen these days.

I enjoyed your analysis, its complete and informative. Please post more songs from the record, it would be awesome if we can figure out (technically speaking)the rest of it!

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you said that MGMT had &#8220;no concept of music theory&#8221; and that they play monophonic cause &#8220;it could be a product of musicians who don’t have the classical training to handle multiple notes at once&#8221; but you have to know that they both studied music in University and they do have musical theory insights but they tend to go against them to create their unique tunes, just listen to the whole Oracular Spectacular record and you&#8217;ll hear some of most original material writen these days.</p>
<p>I enjoyed your analysis, its complete and informative. Please post more songs from the record, it would be awesome if we can figure out (technically speaking)the rest of it!</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Pitchy (Producer Speak) by Kendog</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/pitchy-producer-speak/comment-page-1/#comment-13059</link>
		<dc:creator>Kendog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=1596#comment-13059</guid>
		<description>If you want to get annoyed with word-usage, come the Pacific Northwest where the popular synonym for &quot;expensive&quot; is &quot;spendy.&quot;

Along with &quot;pitchy&quot; (which Ellen soon jumped on as her cool &quot;cred&quot; term for her alleged contributions), Randy is the first i&#039;ve heard use the term &quot;runs&quot; which means &quot;melisma.&quot;  Melismatic singing in Pop music (multiple pitches for each syllable) was innovated by Stevie Wonder and also a bit by Aretha Franklin, and I sure wish it would have stayed there!
Whitney Houston then came along and just took it over the top, adding much much more &quot;improvement&quot; to a melody.
Then came the younger newer singers (Mariah, Christina) with the mentality &quot;oh, i get it! more is better!&quot; and they took melisma to a whole new level of nausea.
Check out Diana Ross&#039; voice on Endless Love, followed by what Mariah did; adding a thousand notes to a couple dozen syllables as a way of making it &quot;even better&quot; in her little musical mind, albeit a gorgeous voice.
Check out the National Anthem sung by most anyone in the last decade. 
I guess the risk of being pitchy is reduced when long held melody notes are a thing of the past.  There&#039;s just too many other available little notes to throw in there, pitchy or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to get annoyed with word-usage, come the Pacific Northwest where the popular synonym for &#8220;expensive&#8221; is &#8220;spendy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Along with &#8220;pitchy&#8221; (which Ellen soon jumped on as her cool &#8220;cred&#8221; term for her alleged contributions), Randy is the first i&#8217;ve heard use the term &#8220;runs&#8221; which means &#8220;melisma.&#8221;  Melismatic singing in Pop music (multiple pitches for each syllable) was innovated by Stevie Wonder and also a bit by Aretha Franklin, and I sure wish it would have stayed there!<br />
Whitney Houston then came along and just took it over the top, adding much much more &#8220;improvement&#8221; to a melody.<br />
Then came the younger newer singers (Mariah, Christina) with the mentality &#8220;oh, i get it! more is better!&#8221; and they took melisma to a whole new level of nausea.<br />
Check out Diana Ross&#8217; voice on Endless Love, followed by what Mariah did; adding a thousand notes to a couple dozen syllables as a way of making it &#8220;even better&#8221; in her little musical mind, albeit a gorgeous voice.<br />
Check out the National Anthem sung by most anyone in the last decade.<br />
I guess the risk of being pitchy is reduced when long held melody notes are a thing of the past.  There&#8217;s just too many other available little notes to throw in there, pitchy or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maverick Recording Company v. Whitney Harper by Dr. Mario</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2010/maverick-recording-company-v-whitney-harper/comment-page-1/#comment-12189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Mario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 04:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=2639#comment-12189</guid>
		<description>was reading some of the posts on music think tank.
pretty interesting debate. 
My question is how is it that music isn&#039;t protected like intellectual property is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was reading some of the posts on music think tank.<br />
pretty interesting debate.<br />
My question is how is it that music isn&#8217;t protected like intellectual property is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Single Ladies&#8221; by Beyonce: A Compositional Analysis by Reba McEntire Covers Beyonce &#124; Hollywood Pad</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/single-ladies-by-beyonce-a-compositional-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-11893</link>
		<dc:creator>Reba McEntire Covers Beyonce &#124; Hollywood Pad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=1110#comment-11893</guid>
		<description>[...] Beyonce, starting to get just a tad obsessed http://twitpic.com/1z01xybitfunk: http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/single-ladies-by-beyonce-a-compositional-analysis/juz_rican: Poison -by beyoncesakacrawford: #nowplaying Beyonce feat. Shakira &#8211; Beautiful Liar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Beyonce, starting to get just a tad obsessed <a href="http://twitpic.com/1z01xybitfunk" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/twitpic.com/1z01xybitfunk?referer=');">http://twitpic.com/1z01xybitfunk</a>: <a href="http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/single-ladies-by-beyonce-a-compositional-analysis/juz_rican" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/single-ladies-by-beyonce-a-compositional-analysis/juz_rican</a>: Poison -by beyoncesakacrawford: #nowplaying Beyonce feat. Shakira &#8211; Beautiful Liar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tritones &amp; Why Locrian Mode &#8220;Doesn&#8217;t Exist&#8221; by c sahar</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/tritones-why-locrian-mode-doesnt-exist/comment-page-1/#comment-11611</link>
		<dc:creator>c sahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=1386#comment-11611</guid>
		<description>Just a little history about Locrian. In medieval music the equivalent scale in its interval make up (on the white keys of the piano B - b)was Hypophrygian. However, the tonic and dominants were different - E for the tonic and A for the Dominant. 

The classification of Locrian came much later - interestingly when the dominant 7 chord became more acceptable in Western music (in Rennaissance music you rarely find dominant 7the as the dissonance of the tritone and 7th was very jarring to Medieval and early Renaissance ears, usually diminished chords were more allowable) 

Note in relation BarNavi&#039;s response, using the third degree of the scale as a dominant for some modes was common to avoid either the tritone or avoid B as a dominant area. 

Finally, when I wrote my own short choral piece in Locrian I realize months afterwards I gravitated to the 4th and 7th degrees of the Locrian scale I used - thereby unconsciously writing at times in Hypophyrgian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a little history about Locrian. In medieval music the equivalent scale in its interval make up (on the white keys of the piano B &#8211; b)was Hypophrygian. However, the tonic and dominants were different &#8211; E for the tonic and A for the Dominant. </p>
<p>The classification of Locrian came much later &#8211; interestingly when the dominant 7 chord became more acceptable in Western music (in Rennaissance music you rarely find dominant 7the as the dissonance of the tritone and 7th was very jarring to Medieval and early Renaissance ears, usually diminished chords were more allowable) </p>
<p>Note in relation BarNavi&#8217;s response, using the third degree of the scale as a dominant for some modes was common to avoid either the tritone or avoid B as a dominant area. </p>
<p>Finally, when I wrote my own short choral piece in Locrian I realize months afterwards I gravitated to the 4th and 7th degrees of the Locrian scale I used &#8211; thereby unconsciously writing at times in Hypophyrgian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bars, Measures, Phrases, Motifs, Riffs, &amp; Licks by c sahar</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/bars-measures-phrases-motifs-riffs-licks/comment-page-1/#comment-11604</link>
		<dc:creator>c sahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=2205#comment-11604</guid>
		<description>great job providing a nice explanation of the fundamentals. 

Continue the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great job providing a nice explanation of the fundamentals. </p>
<p>Continue the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Single Ladies&#8221; by Beyonce: A Compositional Analysis by Pianola</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/single-ladies-by-beyonce-a-compositional-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-11488</link>
		<dc:creator>Pianola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=1110#comment-11488</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only heard this song a few times, but I think I see what you mean by the &quot;B-C&quot; bassline for an E major melody. However, don&#039;t you think it could just by the viio7 of E major? The C natural could just be the flattened seventh note of the leading tone diminished seventh chord. Personally, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s enough clues to imply polytonality. In fact, even when there is modal mixture, it only acts as a type of &quot;borrowing&quot; from another key. I don&#039;t think it means that it&#039;s in E minor and E major at the same time. It could just be an emphasis on a tonally altered chord.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only heard this song a few times, but I think I see what you mean by the &#8220;B-C&#8221; bassline for an E major melody. However, don&#8217;t you think it could just by the viio7 of E major? The C natural could just be the flattened seventh note of the leading tone diminished seventh chord. Personally, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s enough clues to imply polytonality. In fact, even when there is modal mixture, it only acts as a type of &#8220;borrowing&#8221; from another key. I don&#8217;t think it means that it&#8217;s in E minor and E major at the same time. It could just be an emphasis on a tonally altered chord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Audio-Phil(osophy): Things by Jamie</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2009/audio-philosophy-things/comment-page-1/#comment-11353</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=226#comment-11353</guid>
		<description>Brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Maverick Recording Company v. Whitney Harper by &#187; Wired Threat Level eon</title>
		<link>http://blog.fixyourmix.com/2010/maverick-recording-company-v-whitney-harper/comment-page-1/#comment-11156</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Wired Threat Level eon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fixyourmix.com/?p=2639#comment-11156</guid>
		<description>[...] here&#8217;s a link to phil hill&#8217;s blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here&#8217;s a link to phil hill&#8217;s blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
